ISSN 2520-6265 (print)
ISSN 2520-6273 (online)
THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED STABILITY AND LEGITIMACY OF GROUP STATUSES
Authors:
Y. R. Hlushko, master of psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0009-0006-5214-1405
E-mail: glushko301@gmail.com
V. І. Kornitska, master of psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0001-9995-3984
E-mail: nika.kornitskaya@gmail.com
O. G. Vinogradov,PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), Associate Professor (docent),
Social Psychology Department,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0003-1250-3863
E-mail: a.g.vinogradov@knu.ua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2024.1(21).1
Article Information
Issue: 1(21) 2024, pages: 7-22
Language: Ukranian
Received: 21.01.2024
1 st Revision: 26.01.2024
Accepted: 28.01.2024
The article studies the phenomenon of infrahumanization in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Infrahumanization means a tendency to attribute secondary (purely human) emotions to outgroup members in a lesser extent comparing to ingroup members. The study purpose was to reveal how differences in perceived stability and legitimacy of statuses influence Ukrainians’ infrahumanization of Russians, as well as to summarize methodological approaches to the study and measurement of this phenomenon. The study involved 101 Ukrainian psychologists (83.2% women; average age 35). The participants were asked to assess the expression of primary and secondary emotions in the protagonists (Ukrainian and Russian psychologists) in four scenarios describing how some trainings were conducted for Ukrainian refugees (with positive and negative feedback from the training participants). Participants’ perceptions of political regime stability in Russia and the legitimacy of Russia’s invasion to Ukraine were also measured. Multivariate analysis of variance and multiple linear regression were used to analyse the obtained data. The results confirmed an existing infrahumanization effect for negative emotions – participants attributed more negative secondary emotions to Ukrainian psychologists compared to Russian psychologists. Regression analysis showed that perceived political regime stability in Russia was negatively related to infrahumanization (b = -0.20, p < 0.01), while perceived legitimacy of the invasion was positively related to infrahumanization (b = 0.16, p < 0.01). This means that participants who considered the regime in Russia unstable and justified the invasion demonstrated a higher level of infrahumanization of Russians.
Key words: infrahumanization, stability, legitimacy, emotions, intergroup conflict.
References transliterated:
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and social psychology review, 3(3), 193–209.
Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520.
Boekaerts, M. (2010). The crucial role of motivation and emotion in classroom learning. The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice, 91–111.
Brown, R., Eller, A., Leeds, S., & Stace, K. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 692–703.
Cortes, B. P., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, R. T., Rodriguez, A. P., & Leyens, J. P. (2005). Infrahumanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 243–253.
Delgado, N., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Vaes, J., Leyens, J. P., & Betancor, V. (2009). Priming effects of violence on infrahumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 699–714.
Gaunt, R. (2009). Superordinate categorization as a moderator of mutual infrahumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 731–746.
Heilman, K. M., & Gilmore, R. L. (1998). Cortical influences in emotion. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15(5), 409–423.
Kemper, T. D. (1987). How many emotions are there? Wedding the social and automatic components. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 263–289.
Kteily, N., Hodson, G., & Bruneau, E. (2016). They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 343.
Landry, A. P., Ihm, E., & Schooler, J. W. (2022). Hated but still human: Metadehumanization leads to greater hostility than metaprejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 315–334.
Lang, J. (2020). The limited importance of dehumanization in collective violence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 17–20.
Leyens, J. P. (2009). Retrospective and prospective thoughts about infrahumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 807–817.
Leyens, J. P., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., ... & Vaes, J. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism. The 2002 Tajfel Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 703–717.
Leyens, J. P., Demoulin, S., Vaes, J., Gaunt, R., & Paladino, M. P. (2007). Infra humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1(1), 139–172.
Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and social psychology review, 4(2), 186–197.
Leyens, J. P., Rodriguez Perez, A., Rodriguez Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., & Demoulin, S. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 395–411.
Luft, A. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of action at the micro level of genocide: Killing, desistance, and saving in 1994 Rwanda. Sociological Theory, 33(2), 148–172.
Mosso, C., & Russo, S. (2019). The perception of instability and legitimacy of status differences enhances the infrahumanization bias among high status groups. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 358.
Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., Castano, E., Demoulin, S., & Leyens, J. P. (2004). Emotional infra-humanization in intergroup relations: The role of national identification in the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to Italians and Germans. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 519–536.
Russo, S., & Mosso, C. O. (2019). Infrahumanization and socio-structural variables: The role of legitimacy, ingroup identification, and system justification beliefs. Social Justice Research, 32(1), 55–71.