ISSN 2520-6265 (print)
ISSN 2520-6273 (online)
Author:
J. Suomala, PhD (Education), Principal Lecturer (docent),
NeuroLab, Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Espoo, FINLAND
ORCID: 0000-0001-7953-5056
E-mail: jyrki.suomala@laurea.fi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2024.2(22).9
Article Information
Issue: 2(22) 2024, pages: 150-167
Language: English
Received: 17.09.2024
1st Revision: 22.09.2024
Accepted: 26.09.2024
This article explores psychological safety through human decision-making, emphasizing how subtle threats like information disorder, amplified by the Internet and AI, erode trust in democratic institutions. The World Economic Forum identifies this disorder as a significant threat to democracies, necessitating an understanding of its root causes. Research shows that human behavior is driven by the brain's valuation network, with seven decision activators identified: Me, We, Emotion, Knowledge, Goal, Senses, and Differentiation, focusing on Me and We concerning psychological safety. The Me activator relates to self-continuity and personal agency, while threats to identity can lead to insecurity. In today's uncertain climate, liberal democracies face challenges from shifting normative frameworks and growing societal polarization. The We activator highlights the importance of social relationships and cultural norms in influencing behavior. Understanding the interplay between Me and We activators is essential for addressing psychological safety, as individuals often seek validation in environments that feel supportive yet perceive societal institutions as undermining their identity, leaving them vulnerable to manipulation. The article proposes three recommendations for integrating human decision-making complexities into cybersecurity practices: (1) incorporate psychological defense into cybersecurity and national defense; (2) foster open public discourse on harmful psychological attacks while protecting freedom of expression; and (3) enhance official communication to acknowledge the social and contextual influences on decision-making, rather than relying solely on information and facts.
Key words: decision-making, information deficit, valuation network, neuroeconomics, decision-activators, psychological defense, cybersecurity.
References transliterated:
Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L., & Huffman, D. (2011). American Economic Review, 101(2), 470–492.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2010). The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development. Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5202/rei.v1i2.14
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.2.173
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Barry, T. E., & Howard, D. J. (1990). A Review and Critique of the Hierarchy of Effects in Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 9(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.1990.11107138
Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2013). The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. NeuroImage, 76, 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.063
Berns, G. S., & Moore, S. E. (2012). A neural predictor of cultural popularity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.001
Bhui, R., & Gershman, S. J. (2020). Paradoxical effects of persuasive messages. Decision, 7(4), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000123
Bilewicz, M., Witkowska, M., Pantazi, M., Gkinopoulos, T., & Klein, O. (2019). Traumatic rift: How conspiracy beliefs undermine cohesion after societal trauma? Europe's Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1699
Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and Sensibility: When Do (In)Congruent Ambient Scents Influence Product Evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.32
Camerer, C., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. (1997). Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555244
Camerer, C. F. (2013). A Review Essay about Foundations of Neuro economic Analysis by Paul Glimcher. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(4), 1155–1182. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.4.1155
Churchland, P. S. (2006). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. London : MIT Press.
Daunfeldt, S.-O., Rudholm, N., & Sporre, Н. (2016). Eects of Brand-Fit Music on Consumer Behavior: A Field Experiment. HUI Working Paper, 121.
Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). From Neural Responses to Population Behavior: Neural Focus Group Predicts Population-Level Media Effects. Psychological Science, 23(5), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434964
Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Mann, T., Harrison, B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Predicting Persuasion-Induced Behavior Change from the Brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8421–8424. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0063-10.2010
Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Whalen, D., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). Neural activity during health messaging predicts reductions in smoking above and beyond self-report. Health Psychology, 30(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022259
Falk, E. B., O'Donnell, M. B., Tompson, S., Gonzalez, R., Dal Cin, S., Strecher, V., Cummings, K. M., & An, L. (2016). Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv108
Falk, E., & Scholz, C. (2018). Persuasion, Influence, and Value: Perspectives from Communication and Social Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 329–356. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011821
Genevsky, A., Yoon, C., & Knutson, B. (2017). When Brain Beats Behavior: Neuroforecasting Crowdfunding Outcomes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(36), 8625–8634. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-16.2017
Glimcher, P. W., & Tymula, A. A. (2023). Expected subjective value theory (ESVT): A representation of decision under risk and certainty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 207, 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.013
Goldenberg, M. J. (2016). Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy. Perspectives on Science, 24(5), 552–581. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00223
Goldenberg, M. J. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy: Public trust, expertise, and the war on science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Grabenhorst, F., Rolls, E. T., & Bilderbeck, A. (2008). How Cognition Modulates Affective Responses to Taste and Flavor: Top-down Influences on the Orbitofrontal and Pregenual Cingulate Cortices. Cerebral Cortex, 18(7), 1549–1559. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm185
Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A. (2020). Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks. Neuron, 105(3), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.002
Hayden, B. Y., & Heilbronner, S. R. (2014). All that glitters is not reward signal. Nature Neuroscience, 17(9), 1142–1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3795
Hayden, B. Y., & Niv, Y. (2021). The case against economic values in the orbitofrontal cortex (or anywhere else in the brain). Behavioral Neuroscience, 135(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000448
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as Reference Points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708
Juechems, K., & Summerfield, C. (2019). Where Does Value Come From? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.012
Kennaway, R. (2020). When causation does not imply correlation. In The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory (pp. 49–72). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818948-1.00004-6
Kioskli, K., Mouratidis, H., & Polemi, N. (2023). Bringing humans at the core of cybersecurity: Challenges and future research directions. 14th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2023). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003722
Knutson, B., & Genevsky, A. (2018). Neuroforecasting Aggregate Choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417737877
Kőszegi, B. (2010). Utility from anticipation and personal equilibrium. Economic Theory, 44(3), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0465-x
Kühn, S., Strelow, E., & Gallinat, J. (2016). Multiple “buy buttons” in the brain: Forecasting chocolate sales at point-of-sale based on functional brain activation using fMRI. NeuroImage, 136, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.021
Levy, D. J., & Glimcher, P. W. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(6), 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001
Liebling, A. J., & Hamill, P. (2008). World War II writings (1. print). Library of America.
Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1989). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. Dover Publications.
Ma, Y., Bang, D., Wang, C., Allen, M., Frith, C., Roepstorff, A., & Han, S. (2014). Sociocultural patterning of neural activity during self-reflection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss103
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2308
Marken, R., Kennaway, R., & Gulrez, T. (2022). Behavioral illusions: The Snark is a Boojum. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211070271
Masferrer, A. (2023). The Decline of Freedom of Expression and Social Vulnerability in Western democracy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 36(4), 1443–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09990-1
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835–e842. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2365
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). To have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612
Pelham, B., & Mauricio, C. (2015). When Tex and Tess Carpenter Build Houses in Texas: Moderators of Implicit Egotism. Self and Identity, 14(6), 692–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1070745
Powers, W. T. (1973). Feedback: Beyond Behaviorism: Stimulus-response laws are wholly predictable within a control-system model of behavioral organization. Science, 179(4071), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4071.351
Purves, D., Morgenstern, Y., & Wojtach, W. T. (2015). Perception and Reality: Why a Wholly Empirical Paradigm is Needed to Understand Vision. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00156
Ross, A. R. N., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022). Russian Meddling in U.S. Elections: How News of Disinformation's Impact Can Affect Trust in Electoral Outcomes and Satisfaction with Democracy. Mass Communication and Society, 25(6), 786–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2119871
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour. Economica, 5(17), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548836
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976
Sedikides, C., Hong, E. K., & Wildschut, T. (2023). Self-Continuity. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-032236
Sharot, T., & Garrett, N. (2016). Forming Beliefs: Why Valence Matters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.002
Sharot, T., Rollwage, M., Sunstein, C. R., & Fleming, S. M. (2023). Why and When Beliefs Change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082967
Staszak, S., Maciejowska, J., Urjasz, W., Misiuro, T., & Cudo, A. (2022). The Relationship between the Need for Closure and Coronavirus Fear: The Mediating Effect of Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214789
Stiller, R. (2024). Keneen sinä luotat? (From Finnish to English: Who do you trust?). YLE (Finnish Broadcasting Company).
Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., & Bäcker, A. (2015). Striving for group agency: Threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00649
Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4
Suomala, J. (2020). The Consumer Contextual Decision-Making Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 570430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570430
Suomala, J. (2023). Ostavat Aivot (in English The Buyung Brain). BasamBooks.
Suomala, J., & Berg, P. (2024). Brain's Valuation Networks and Consumer Neuroscience Methods in the Fuzzy Front-End of the Innovation Process. In L. Moutinho & M. Cerf (Eds.), Biometrics and Neuroscience Research in Business and Management (pp. 207–222). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110708509-011
Suomala, J., Hlushchuk, Y., Kauttonen, J., Heinonen, J., Palokangas, L., & Numminen, J. (2017). Distributed brain networks reflect salary offer in accordance with the prospect theory's value function. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 10(4), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000083
Suomala, J., & Kauttonen, J. (2022). Human's Intuitive Mental Models as a Source of Realistic Artificial Intelligence and Engineering. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873289
Suomala, J., & Kauttonen, J. (2023). Computational meaningfulness as the source of beneficial cognitive biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1189704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189704
Tong, L. C., Acikalin, M. Y., Genevsky, A., Shiv, B., & Knutson, B. (2020). Brain activity forecasts video engagement in an internet attention market. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6936–6941. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905178117
Van Vark, A. (2021). Under Pressure: Security and Stability Related Challenges for Liberal Democracy in North-western Europe. Democracy and Security, 17(3), 296–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2021.1920930
Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious Affective Reactions to Masked Happy Versus Angry Faces Influence Consumption Behavior and Judgments of Value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271309
World Economic Forum. (2024). The global risks report 2024 (19th ed.). Retrieved from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdfInsight
Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M., & Hasson, U. (2021). The default mode network: Where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-00420-w
Yin, H. (2020). Chapter 3—The crisis in neuroscience. In W. Mansell (Ed.), The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory (pp. 23–48). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818948-1.00003-4