PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF POST-TRAUMATIC GROWTH IN VETERANS
Authors:
T. S. Kudrina, PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), Associate Professor,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0002-8553-2457
E-mail: mikhajlenko.tatiana@gmail.com
O. Y. Kozlovska, Second-year PhD student,
Educational and Scientific Program "Psychology", Faculty of Psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0002-0947-7679
E-mail: kozlovska0410@gmail.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2024.2(22).3
Article Information
Issue: 2(22) 2024, pages: 45-61
Language: Ukrainian
Received: 09.09.2024
1st Revision: 15.09.2024
Accepted: 18.09.2024
Abstract
The article provides an overview of modern scientific literature that examines the psychological factors influencing post-traumatic growth in veterans having combat experience. The main focus is on psychological resources such as resilience (psychological strength), stress coping styles, and emotional regulation, which are keys for adaptation after traumatic events. Special attention is paid to the role of personal experience in veterans who have undergone combat operations and how this experience can contribute to post-traumatic growth – a process of positive changes that occur after trauma. The article thoroughly reviews the results of recent empirical studies that emphasize the importance of these psychological factors in shaping recovery strategies. In particular, studies show that veterans with strong resilience and effective stress coping styles are better able to adapt to the consequences of hostilities and can achieve post-traumatic growth. They not only adapt more easily to stressful situations but also find new strengths for development after trauma, which helps them lead more fulfilling lives. Based on the analysis of scientific papers, key directions for future research have been identified. It is particularly important to continue studying the mechanisms of emotional regulation, adaptive stress coping strategies, and the role of social support for veterans. Research in these areas can contribute to the development of more effective psychological assistance programs aimed at supporting veterans, improving their psychosocial well-being, and fostering their post-traumatic growth after experiencing combat hostilities. Regarding prospects for future research, we should note that upcoming studies should focus on developing new approaches to supporting veterans while considering the complex nature of their post-traumatic experience, shaped by prolonged combat conditions. There is a need to explore the possibility of integrating multidisciplinary methods and introducing innovative therapeutic techniques that will help maximize their recovery and successful adaptation to civilian life. Given that the conflict is still ongoing and combat operations continue, it is essential to develop approaches that reflect the realities when veterans return to civilian life under the influence of constant threat and stress. Taking into account the specific features of the post-traumatic experience formed in such conditions is a key to a deeper understanding the mechanisms of psychological adaptation and personal growth in veterans who seek to adapt to civilian life despite the ongoing conflict.
Key words: post-traumatic growth, veterans, combat experience, resilience, psychological resources, coping strategies, social support.
References transliterated:
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D. (2006). Psychological resilience after disaster: New York City in the aftermath of the September 11th terroristmedel attack. Psychological Science, 17(3), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01682.x
Christopher, M. A. (2004). A bio-psycho-social model of posttraumatic stress disorder: A shift in the paradigm. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 195–203.
Dekel, S., Mandl, C., & Solomon, Z. (2011). Is the war really over? A longitudinal study of posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic growth among former prisoners of war. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72(3), 358–366.
Drescher, K. D., et al. (2011). An exploration of the viability and usefulness of the construct of moral injury in war veterans. Traumatology, 17, 8–13.
Frazier, P., & Kaler, M. (2006). Assessing the validity of self-reported stress-related growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.859
Gray, M. J., et al. (2011). Adaptive disclosure: An open trial of a novel exposure-based intervention for service members with combat-related psychological stress injuries. Behavior Therapy, 43(2), 407–415.
Hobfoll, S. E., Hall, B. J., Canetti-Nisim, D., Galea, S., Johnson, R. J., & Palmieri, P. A. (2007). Refining our understanding of traumatic growth in the face of terrorism: Moving from meaning cognitions to doing what is meaningful. Applied Psychology, 56(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00292.x
Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2006). Growth following adversity: Theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(8), 1041–1053.
Levine, S. Z., Laufer, A., Stein, E., Hamama-Raz, Y., & Solomon, Z. (2008). Examining the relationship between resilience and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(4), 282–289.
Litz, B. T., et al. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 695–706.
Maguen, S., et al. (2010). The impact of reported direct and indirect killing on mental health symptoms in Iraq War veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, 86–90.
McFarland, C., & Alvaro, C. (2000). The impact of motivation on temporal comparisons: Coping with traumatic events by perceiving personal growth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.327
Papadopulos, R. K. (2007). The handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(4), 411–415.
Pietrzak, R. H., Johnson, D. C., Goldstein, M. B., Malley, J. C., & Southwick, S. M. (2010). Psychological resilience and postdeployment social support protect against traumatic stress and depressive symptoms in soldiers returning from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. Depression and Anxiety, 27(1), 1–7.
Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L. (2009). Optimism, social support, and coping strategies as factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14(5), 364–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325020902724271
Shakespeare-Finch, J., & Copping, A. (2006). A grounded theory approach to understanding cultural differences in posttrauma growth. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 11(5), 355–371.
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., & Oishi, S. (2008). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
Tokhtamysh, O., & Rubanova, O. (2019). Posttraumatic growth in a process of rehabilitation. ResearchGate, 3, 57–73.
Zoellner, T., & Maercker, A. (2006). Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology: A critical review and introduction of a two-component model. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 626–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.01.008