STUDENTS’ EXPERT COMPETENCE IN THE SPACE OF PSYCHOSEMANTIC ASSESSMENTS OF POLITICAL AGENTS
Author:
V. O. Vasiutynskyi, DSc. in Psychology Sciences, Professor,
Chief Researcher,
Institute for Social and Political Psychology, NAES of Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-9808-4550
Scopus ID: 57213606129
E-mail: vadymvas55@gmail.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2024.2(22).1
Article Information
Issue: 2(22) 2024, pages: 9-24
Language: Ukrainian
Received: 21.09.2024
1st Revision: 26.09.2024
Accepted: 30.09.2024
Abstract
The article reveals the peculiarities of students' expert competence based on the assessments of the results of the semantic evaluation of political agents. At the first stage of the research, 496 residents of Ukraine were interviewed online. With the personal differential method, the respondents evaluated "typical Ukrainians", "typical Russians", President Zelenskyi, other authorities, "typical Poles", as well as how Poles see Ukrainians. At the second stage, 607 students from 7 universities acted as experts and tried to assess how they thought the respondents in the previous study had answered. The level of their expert competence depended on the accuracy of the assessments. The questionnaire also included questionnaires on collective narcissism, gender roles, psychological inclination to poverty. According to the results of the first stage, it was found that the respondents highly valued Ukrainians as a reference community and actively identified with it. The Poles were rated somewhat lower, and the Russians received the lowest points. The image of Ukrainians in the eyes of Poles occupied an intermediate position between the assessments of Ukrainians and Poles. The attitudes towards the authorities were dominated by neutral or critical assessments, the level of identification with it was low. The attitudes towards Zelenskyi turned out to be contradictory: he was the object of positive identification both by the respondents themselves and, in their opinion, by Ukrainians in general; the laudable image of Zelenskyi was significantly contrasted with the rest of the unattractive authorities; Zelenskyi and the rest of the authorities were united partly by positive perception, and partly by negative one. At the second stage, correlations of expert competence with social and psychological characteristics of the student sample were recorded. The positive correlation with age in comparing the assessments of Ukrainians and Zelenskyi was considered as a consequence of life and political experience. The connection between expert competence and collective narcissism in comparison of the assessments of Ukrainians and the image of Ukrainians in the eyes of Poles was explained by the sensitivity of carriers of collective narcissism to foreigners’ attitudes to Ukrainians. The reason for the positive dependence of expert competence on femininity in the comparison of assessments of Zelenskyi and other authorities was recognized to be an increased sensitivity to the assessment of influential figures in politics. Presumably, the basis of the positive correlation of expert competence with the inclination to poverty and the negative correlation with masculinity in comparing the assessments of Ukrainians and Poles lies in the tendency to dependence and helplessness.
Key words: expert competence, personality differential, assessments of political agents, attitude towards the authorities, collective narcissism, gender-role identity, psychological inclination to poverty.
References transliterated:
Chan, Ch. S. et al. (2023). The Influence of Perceived Threat and Political Mistrust on Politicized Identity and Normative and Violent Nonnormative Collective Action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.7979
Colledge, D., & Ingram, J. (2023). Outgroup Attitudes, Personality and Support for Secessionist Movements: IWAH and Collective Narcissism Predict Support for Scottish Independence. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6811
Corfield, P. (2021). Being Assessed as a Whole Person: A Critique of Identity Politics. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL101
Golec de Zavala, A. et al. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. DOI: 10.1037/a0016904
Lewicka, M., & Iwańczak, B. (2018). Uncompleted identity and its consequences: compensations and synergies in Ukrainian identifications. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59, 3–4, 496–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1574434
Pradillo-Caimari, C. et al. (2023). On (National) Citizenship and (De)Politicised Nations: Everyday Discourses About the Catalan Secessionist Movement. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.9275
Afanasieva, N. ta yn. (2019). Psykhosemantychnyi analiz uiavlen psykholohiv-praktykiv pro mistse psykholohichnoho konsultuvannia [Psychosemantic analysis of practicing psychologists' perceptions of the place of psychological counseling]. Elektronnyi repozytarii Natsionalnoho universytetu tsyvilnoho zakhystu Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9939
Bilyi, O. V. ta yn. (2018). Hlobalizatsiia i kulturna identychnist: ukrainskyi vymir [Globalization and cultural identity: the Ukrainian dimension]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HFX4hdDOU_6lJd4BmtQIrgQl8fmpbrVL/view
Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2013). Pytalnyk «Psykholohichne tiazhinnia do bidnosti»: metodolohichne obgruntuvannia, protsedura rozrobky, zmist [Questionnaire "Psychological Attraction to Poverty": methodological justification, development procedure, content]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii, 32(35), 54–62. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nsspp_2013_32_7
Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2014). Vyvchaiuchy masovu politychnu svidomist i povedinku: uroky pershoi monohrafii [Studying mass political consciousness and behavior: lessons from the first monograph]. 10 x 20: zb. nauk. prats, 43–52. [in Ukrainian].
Voropaieva, T. (2016). Spilna identychnist v konteksti konsolidatsii ukrainstva [Common identity in the context of the consolidation of Ukrainian identity]. Visnyk KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Ukrainoznavstvo, 1(18), 11–14. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: http://ukrbulletin.univ.kiev.ua/Visnyk-18/5.pdf
Horlynskyi, V., & Horlynsyi, B. (2021). Analiz kliuchovykh chynnykiv formuvannia systemy kompetentnostei fakhivtsiv u haluzi kiberbezpeky [Analysis of key factors in the formation of the system of competencies of specialists in the field of cybersecurity]. Information Technology and Security, 9, 2(17), 219–231. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.20535/2411-1031.2021.9.2.249976
Drozdova, M. A. (2023). Osoblyvosti perezhyvannia ta usvidomlennia rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny moloddiu: kontent-analiz studentsykh naratyviv [Peculiarities of youth's experience and awareness of the Russian-Ukrainian war: content analysis of student narratives]. Psychological patterns of social processes and personality development (p. 106–127). Riga, Latvia : Baltija Publishing. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-362-0-6
Ivanov, I. (2012). Teoretyko-metodolohichnyi kontsept vzaiemodii identychnostei [Theoretical and methodological concept of the interaction of identities]. Politychnyi menedzhment, 1–2, 18–27. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ivanov_teoretyko.pdf
Ivasiv, O. (2020). Model ekspertnoho otsiniuvannia proektnoi diialnosti v zakladi zahalnoi serednioi osvity [Model of expert evaluation of project activities in a general secondary education institution]. Adaptyvne upravlinnia: teoriia i praktyka. Seriia Pedahohika, 10(19). [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0255-10(19)-12
Karpa, M. (2020). Arkhetypni zasady masovoi politychnoi svidomosti: publichno-upravlinskyi aspekt [Archetypal principles of mass political consciousness: public-administrative aspect]. Publichne uriaduvannia, 1(21), 108–121. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-107-121
Korzhov, H. (2010). Osoblyvosti terytorialnoi identyfikatsii naselennia suchasnoi Ukrainy [Features of territorial identification of the population of modern Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi sotsium, 2(33), 31–43. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2010.02.031
Podolianchuk, S. V. (2014). Vyznachennia kompetentnosti ekspertiv z otsiniuvannia naukovoi diialnosti u vyshchomu pedahohichnomu navchalnomu zakladi [Determining the competence of experts in evaluating scientific activity in a higher pedagogical educational institution]. Teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia sotsialnymy systemamy: filosofiia, psykholohiia, pedahohika, sotsiolohiia, 4, 112–122. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/18124
Reva, O. M., & Kamyshyn, V. V. (2018). Metod vyznachennia intehratyvnoho pokaznyka kompetentnosti eksperta [Method for determining the integrative indicator of expert competence]. Nauka, tekhnolohii, innovatsii, 3(7), 27–38. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/162637
Saveliuk, N. M. (2024). Psykhosemantychni vymiry perezhyvannia psykhoemotsiinykh staniv ukraintsiamy v umovakh viiny [Psychosemantic dimensions of the experience of psychoemotional states by Ukrainians in war conditions]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Psykholohiia, 1, 139–147. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-psy-2024-1-19
Tokhtamysh, O. M. (2012). Psykhosemantychne vidobrazhennia poniattia «Bolonskyi protses» u ioho otsintsi vykladachamy ta studentamy: porivnialnyi analiz [Psychosemantic reflection of the concept of the “Bologna Process” in its assessment by teachers and students: a comparative analysis]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii ta ii rol u stanovlenni hromadianyna Ukrainskoi derzhavy, 13, 357–365. [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://ispp.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/zb13.txt
Iaroshenko, A., & Semyhina, T. (2023). Aprobatsiia ukrainomovnykh versii opytuvalnykiv dlia vyvchennia gendernykh uperedzhen [Testing Ukrainian-language versions of questionnaires for studying gender biases]. Social Work and Education, 10, 2, 195–210. [in Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.25128/2520-6230.23.2.4