ISSN 2520-6265 (print)

ISSN 2520-6273 (online)


AN INDIVIDUAL’S COGNITIVE FILTERS AS A FACTOR
FORMING HIS/HER CREATIVE THINKING



Authors:
I. V. Danyliuk, DSc. in Psychology Sciences, Professor,
Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine,
Dean of the Faculty of Psychology, Professor at the Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0002-6522-5994
Researcher ID: B-9146-2019
E-mail: psydanyliuk@knu.ua

О. О. Polysaev, PhD (Philosophe Doctor), Master’s student at the Institute of Postgraduate Education
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,
Staff member at the Training Center «Resource studio»
ORCID: 0009-0000-0961-818X
Researcher ID: NQE-5264-2025
E-mail: greenstreetlight14@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2025.2(24).3

Article Information
Issue: 2(24) 2025, pages: 50-72
Language: Ukrainian
Received: 12.10.2025
1st Revision: 16.10.2025
Accepted: 22.10.2025


Abstract

The article studies cognitive filters of individuals having highly developed creative thinking. Basing on theoretical assumptions, we have formulated the hypothesis that certain mental distortions are interconnected with human creative abilities. The empirical part of our research was aimed to test this hypothesis.

According to the obtained results, we revealed a correlation between unconventional ways of perceiving information and the ability to generate original ideas. Creativity is considered as a product of human activity that is preceded by an atypical perception of phenomena, events or circumstances. An individual’s peculiarities of brain functioning and the corresponding cognitive distortions contribute to a non-standard thinking style. In this context, originality of thinking emerges as a mental ability and sometimes as a predisposition to create something new. Certain mental “omissions” can serve as a foundation for stepping outside the boundaries of stereotypical perception of the reality. The way of informational processing, shaped during socialization, can be transformed under internal needs or external factors.

In our study, cognitive omissions were defined as unconscious simplifications, distortions or gaps in perception, thinking and informational analysis that arose under influences of cognitive schemas, biases or habitual mental models. These omissions manifested as exaggeration of certain details, neglect of some context or unconventional structuring of information. In the case of creative individuals, these mental features not only did not hinder productive thinking but actually contributed to original ideas, novel problem-solving strategies and rethinking of familiar phenomena. This type of distortion is of particular interest for further empirical investigation. Future research will focus on examining the specific features of cognitive distortions characteristic of individuals with poor creative thinking.

Key words: cognitive filters, mental omissions, creative thinking, creative process, personalization, mind reading, moralization.

References:

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Cooper, L. (2012). Creative Thinking: A Guide for Nurturing and Developing Creativity. Springer Science & Business Media.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kobeyn, O. F. (2012). The Charisma Myth: How Anyone Can Master the Art and Science of Personal Magnetism. New York: Portfolio.

Peterson, J. (1999). Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief. London: Routledge.

Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers: The Acclaimed Guide to Stress, Stress-Related Diseases, and Coping. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151

Torrance, E. P. (1980). Growing Up Creatively Gifted: The 22-Year Longitudinal Study. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 3, 148–158.

Yurica, C. L. (2002). Inventory of Cognitive Distortions: Development and Validation of a Psychometric Test for the Measurement of Cognitive Distortions. Philadelphia: Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine.

Akimova, O. V. (2018). Reflection in the structure of creative thinking. Psychological Sciences: Problems and Achievements, 32, 5–14. [in Ukrainian].

Balakhtar, K. S. (2021). Peculiarities of the influence of creativity on the subjective well-being of foreign language teachers in higher education institutions [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Educational Management of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Bielska, N. A., Melnyk, M. Yu. & Novohorodska, M. M. (2021). Diagnostics of creativity in career guidance: Methodical recommendations. Kyiv: Institute of Gifted Child, NAPS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].

Hubenko, O. V. (2017). Methodology for developing creative thinking in students of pedagogical specialties. Problems of Modern Psychology, (30), 78–89. [in Ukrainian].

Danylyuk, I. V., Serdiuk, L. Z., Turban, V. V., Penkova, O. I., Volodarska, N. D., & others (2018). Psychological technologies of self-determination of personality development [Monograph; L. Z. Serdiuk, Ed.]. Kyiv: H. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology, NAPS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].

Doroshenko, O. (2024). Peculiarities of creative thinking in student youth [Master’s thesis]. Poltava Polytechnic National University named after Yuri Kondratyuk. [in Ukrainian].

Zaika, Ye. V., & Zimovin, O. I. (2015). Personal reflexivity as a subject of psychological cognition. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Psychology, 58, 57–60. [in Ukrainian].

Zimovin, O. I. (2016). Reflection and creativity as factors of personal self-development at different stages of life [Candidate dissertation]. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv.

Kovalenko, A. B. (2004). The psychology of understanding creative problems: Psychology and society, 4 (18), 110-127. [in Ukrainian].

Kutsenko, H. V., & Mariyanenko, L. V., & others (2000). Psychological assessment of cognitive style of personality / edited by S. D. Maksymenko. In Psychological factors of developmental education in various educational systems (pp. 139–198). Kyiv: H. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology, APS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].

Kuchynova, N. M. (2017). Development of the creative component of professional thinking of future marketers [Candidate dissertation, specialty 19.00.07 – Developmental psychology and pedagogy]. Kyiv: Zaporizhzhia Pedagogical University named after M. P. Drahomanov. [in Ukrainian].

Kuzmenko, T. M. (2020). Peculiarities of using art therapy technologies in the work of a practicing psychologist. In Psychological and pedagogical assistance to the individual by means of art therapy (T. A. Tkachuk & N. O. Bocharina, Eds.), 365. Pereiaslav (Kyiv region): Dombrovska Ya. M. [in Ukrainian].

Nikolenko, K. V. (2017). Creativity as a factor of social change (09.00.03 – Social philosophy and philosophy of history) [Candidate dissertation]. Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Palii, A. A. (2004). Cognitive styles as determinants of interpersonal differences. Collection of scientific works: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology, (9, part 1), 45–51. [in Ukrainian].

Pankhovets, V. L. (2020). Experience of implementing distance learning based on the course “Psychology of Mass Behavior” during the national quarantine of 2020. In Emergency distance learning in Ukraine (V. M. Kukharenko & V. V. Bondarenko, Eds.), 289–295. Kharkiv: City Print House. [in Ukrainian].