ISSN 2520-6265 (print)

ISSN 2520-6273 (online)


THE INTERPERSONAL SUPPORT EVALUATION LIST (ISEL-12): ITS UKRAINIAN ADAPTATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES



Authors:
O. O. Veldbrekht, PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences),
Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0001-7805-0890
E-mail: veldbreht@gmail.com

D. V. Marfina, Second-year undergraduate student,
Faculty of Psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0009-0004-5815-0930
E-mail: dmarfina13@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2025.1(23).3

Article Information
Issue: 1(23) 2025, pages: 41-68
Language: Ukrainian
Received: 10.02.2025
1st Revision: 16.02.2025
Accepted: 19.02.2025


Abstract

The article describes the procedure for adapting and validating a Ukrainian version of the questionnaire for assessing the perceived availability of social resources – the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (short version with 12 items). The theoretical foundation of this instrument is the stressor-support matching model, developed by S. Cohen and colleagues within the cognitive theory of stress. Subjective perception of social support influences significantly how individuals interpret stressful situations as well as their ability to cope such situations, thus contributing to physical health and psychological well-being during adverse life events. The tool has a well-established history and has been widely used in clinical, social and psychological research. The brief version ISEL-12 provides an economical procedure for conducting and processing, suitable for online surveys. At the same time, the questionnaire provides a differentiated assessment of three functional subtypes of social support: belonging, appraisal and tangible support. The adaptation procedure included forward and backward translation, a pretest with a focus group of 26 university students, and a large-scale validation study on a sample of 437 participants aged 14 to 74. The empirical results supported psychometric soundness of the Ukrainian version. The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency, good discriminant capacity, retest reliability, structural and convergent validity, and predictive validity in relation to perceived stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed adequacy of the three-factor structure, supporting the theoretical model of social support. Our adapted version of Ukr-ISEL-12 can be recommended for use by specialists in scientific research and practitioners in psychological and social care settings. The article includes the questionnaire form and sample normative data.

Key words: social support, subjective perception, stress, coping, personal resources, psychological well-being, depression, anxiety.

References:

Bhatia, R., Hirsch, C., Arnold, A. M., Newman, A. B., & Mukamal, K. J. (2023). Social networks, social support, and life expectancy in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 111, 104981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.104981

Brookings, J. B., & Bolton, B. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00906076

Chronister, J., Chou, C. C., Chen, Y. I., & Wu, Y. J. (2022). Received Social Support Scale for Persons with Serious Mental Illness: Preliminary scale development and validation study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 67(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000429

Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(2), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02325.x

Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (1984). Social Support, Stress and the Buffering Hypothesis: A Theoretical Analysis. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology and Health (Vol. IV, pp. 253–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the Functional Components of Social Support. In I. G. Sarason & B. Sarason (Eds.), Social Support: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 73–94). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5115-0_5

Cohen, S., & Syme, S. L. (Eds.). (1985). Social support and health. San Francisco: Academic Press.

Cutrona, C. E. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.3

Hidayati, F., Hartini, N., & Chusairi, A. (2024). Adaptation of Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL-12) for Mothers of Children Aged 3-6 Years in Indonesian Context. Psikoislamika: Jurnal Psikologi dan Psikologi Islam, 21(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.18860/psikoislamika.v21i1.26342

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition. Version 2.4). http://www.InTestCom.org

Kessler, R. C., Price, R. H., & Wortman, C. B. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531–572. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002531

Laboratory for the Study of Stress, Immunity, and Disease (2008). Basic Psychometrics for the ISEL 12 item scale. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/psychology/stress-immunity-disease-lab/scales/index.html

Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and measurement. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 29–52). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0002

Litwic-Kaminska, K., Błachnio, A., Kapsa, I., Brzeziński, Ł., Kopowski, J., Stojković, M., Hinić, D., Krsmanović, I., Ragni, B., Sulla, F., & Limone, P. (2023). Resilience, Positivity and Social Support as Perceived Stress Predictors among University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(19), 6892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20196892

Merz, E. L., Roesch, S. C., Malcarne, V. L., Penedo, F. J., Llabre, M. M., Weitzman, O. B., Navas-Nacher, E. L., Perreira, K. M., Gonzalez, F., Ponguta, L. A., Johnson, T. P., & Gallo, L. C. (2014). Validation of interpersonal support evaluation list-12 (ISEL-12) scores among English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035248

Neisler, J., Reitzel, L. R., Garey, L., Kendzor, D. E., Hébert, E. T., Vijayaraghavan, M., & Businelle, M. S. (2018). The moderating effect of perceived social support on the relation between heaviness of smoking and quit attempts among adult homeless smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 190, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.007

Platt, J., Keyes, K. M., & Koenen, K. C. (2014). Size of the social network versus quality of social support: which is more protective against PTSD? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(8), 1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0798-4

Sacco, P., Casado, B. L., & Unick, G. J. (2010). Differential Item Functioning Across Race in Aging Research: An Example Using a Social Support Measure. Clinical Gerontologist, 34(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2011.524818

Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(4), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846149