ISSN 2520-6265 (print)
ISSN 2520-6273 (online)
Authors:
N. M. Bulatevych, PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences),
Associate Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0000-0002-2971-874X
Researcher ID: KHW-6087-2024
Scopus ID: 57201291641
E-mail: bulatevich@ukr.net
V. V. Lukyanets, Master’s Student (Psychology of Childhood and Family),
Faculty of Psychology,
Department of Developmental Psychology,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
ORCID: 0009-0001-3078-4411
E-mail: vikalucky1@gmail.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2025.1(23).1
Article Information
Issue: 1(23) 2025, pages: 9-26
Language: Ukrainian
Received: 12.03.2025
1st Revision: 16.03.2025
Accepted: 22.03.2025
The article presents an adaptation of the «How Codependent Are You?» scale developed by J. and B. Weinholds for a Ukrainian-speaking sample. The authors emphasize that co-dependency is a widespread complex phenomenon that continues to attract scientific interest. It is characterized by behavioral patterns and emotional experiences within interpersonal relationships when a person becomes excessively dependent on others.
The article analyzes the conceptual framework of codependency proposed by J. and B. Weinholds and notes that reviewed publications revealed a lack of studies examining the psychometric properties of the original scale or its translations, including in Ukrainian. Moreover, concerns were raised regarding the content validity of some scale items as indicators of codependency.
An expert review of the scale items was conducted by three independent specialists. Based on their analysis, nine items were identified as conceptually relevant to the construct of codependency.
The study aim was to create a Ukrainian version of the scale and evaluate its psychometric characteristics.
A back-translation method was used. The sample consisted of 235 respondents (88.9% women), who completed the questionnaire online. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency measures (Cronbach’s alpha, etc.), and indicators of concurrent validity were applied to assess the scale’s psychometric properties. The ESEM results showed that the original one-factor model provided a suboptimal fit; better statistical indices were obtained for two- to four-factor models. However, the most optimal structure appeared to be a one-factor model based on the nine expert-selected items.
The adapted scale expands capability for examining codependency and may serve as a tool for both further scientific research and practical psychological work.
Key words: codependency, family system, dysfunctional families, interpersonal relationships, psychometric properties of the scale.
References:
Backe, B., Bonck, E. L., & Riley, M. L. (1994). Codependency and depression: A correlational study. Journal of Couples Therapy, 4(1–2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1300/J036v04n01_08
Chang, S. H. (2018). Testing a model of codependency for college students in Taiwan based on Bowen’s concept of differentiation. International Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12271
Iliescu, D., Bartram, D., Zeinoun, P., Ziegler, M., Elosua, P., Sireci, S., et al. (2024). The Test Adaptation Reporting Standards (TARES): Reporting test adaptations. International Journal of Testing, 24(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2023.2294266
Kaya, Z., Kale, K., Yağan, F., & Kaya, Ş. (2024). The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and emotional neglect and codependency. Children and Youth Services Review, 161, 107670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107670
Tanhan, F., & Mukba, G. (2014). Spann-Fischer ilişki bağımlılığı ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışmasına ilişkin psikometrik bir analiz. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (36), 179–190. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/pauefd/issue/32869/374891
Weinhold, B., & Weinhold, J. (2008a). Breaking free of the co-dependency trap. Novato: New World Library.
Weinhold, B., & Weinhold, J. (2008b). The flight from intimacy: Healing your relationship of counter-dependency – The other side of codependency. Novato: New World Library.
Kocharian, O. S., Frolova, Ye. V., & Baru, I. O. (2012). Otsinka psikhodiahnostychnykh mozhlyvostei metodyk diaghnostyky mizhososobovoi zalezhnosti [Assessment of psychodiagnostic capabilities of methods for diagnosing interpersonal dependence]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H. S. Skovorody. Psykholohiia, 43(2), 155–165. [in Ukrainian].
Kocharian, O. S., & Frolova, Ye. V. (Uklad.). (2010). Psykholohiia adyktyvnoi povedinky: navchalno-metodychnyi kompleks dlia studentiv zi spetsialnosti «Psykholohiia» [Psychology of Addictive Behavior: Educational and Methodological Complex for Students Majoring in «Psychology»]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. [in Ukrainian].
Lymankina, A. I. (2022). Suchasni pidkhody do rozuminnia definitsii fenomena «spivzalezhnist» [Modern approaches to understanding the definition of the phenomenon of «codependence»]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Psykholohiia, (3), 62–65. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2022.3.12